Current:Home > InvestMissouri Supreme Court strikes down law against homelessness, COVID vaccine mandates -BrightFuture Investments
Missouri Supreme Court strikes down law against homelessness, COVID vaccine mandates
View
Date:2025-04-13 00:48:47
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — The Missouri Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a law that threatened homeless people with jail time for sleeping on state land.
Judges ruled unanimously to toss the law for violating a section of the Missouri Constitution that prohibits legislation from containing multiple unrelated subjects.
In this case, the sweeping 64-page bill also dealt with city and county governance and banned COVID-19 vaccine requirements for public workers in Missouri.
Judges ruled that the law is “invalid in its entirety,” Judge Paul Wilson wrote in the court’s decision.
The judges’ ruling means unhoused people no longer face up to 15 days in jail and a $500 fine after an initial warning for sleeping on state land without permission, and vaccine mandates for public workers now are allowed in Missouri.
The law, enacted in 2022, also had prohibited state funding from being used for permanent housing for homeless people, instead directing it toward temporary shelters and assistance with substance use and mental health treatment.
In an amicus brief, advocates for homeless people argued that lawmakers “blamed mental health and substance abuse for causing homelessness, but ignored that the real problem is affordable housing and offered no real mental-health or substance-abuse solutions in the bill.”
“And in the process, they tried to justify criminalizing homelessness as a method of improving outcomes for homeless individuals,” attorneys for organizations including the National Coalition for the Homeless wrote.
A spokeswoman for the Attorney General’s Office, which defended the law in court, did not immediately respond to an Associated Press request for comment Tuesday.
Records obtained by The AP show attempts to clear homeless encampments increased in cities from Los Angeles to New York as public pressure grew to address what some residents say are dangerous and unsanitary living conditions.
In March, bulldozers took down what was left of a once-busy homeless encampment along the Mississippi River and near the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, ending nearly a year of debate over what to do about it.
Supreme Court judges ruled against the Missouri law without discussing the potential impact of the homelessness policy, instead focusing on whether that issue fits under the bill’s subject: political subdivisions.
Wilson wrote that the connection between homelessness and political subdivisions is “remote at best and, in some instances, completely missing.”
State lawmakers had added the homelessness provision, along with 49 other new sections, to the legislation in an attempt to pass bills that otherwise were too far behind in the process to advance before the end-of-session deadline in 2022.
The lawmaker who spearheaded the homelessness provisions has since left office, and so far no other legislators have filed bills to reinstate the policy.
One Missouri lawmaker, Sen. Steven Roberts, proposed legislation that would have relaxed the homelessness provisions. On Tuesday, he said he was not yet aware of the court ruling striking down the law but likely will pull his proposal in response.
Missouri’s next legislative session begins in January.
veryGood! (6396)
Related
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Hollywood actors agree to federal mediation with strike threat looming
- Exploding California Wildfires Rekindle Debate Over Whether to Snuff Out Blazes in Wilderness Areas or Let Them Burn
- Celebrity Makeup Artists Reveal the Only Lipstick Hacks You'll Ever Need
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Ecuador’s High Court Affirms Constitutional Protections for the Rights of Nature in a Landmark Decision
- 3 dead, multiple people hurt in Greyhound bus crash on Illinois interstate highway ramp
- Ecuador’s High Court Affirms Constitutional Protections for the Rights of Nature in a Landmark Decision
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Trump’s Interior Department Pressures Employees to Approve Seismic Testing in ANWR
Ranking
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Russia has amassed a shadow fleet to ship its oil around sanctions
- Tesla's profits soared to a record – but challenges are mounting
- A recession might be coming. Here's what it could look like
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- In Final Debate, Trump and Biden Display Vastly Divergent Views—and Levels of Knowledge—On Climate
- Oil refineries release lots of water pollution near communities of color, data show
- House GOP chair accuses HHS of changing their story on NIH reappointments snafu
Recommendation
Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
Hollywood actors agree to federal mediation with strike threat looming
Ex-staffer sues Fox News and former Trump aide over sexual abuse claims
Let Your Reflection Show You These 17 Secrets About Mulan
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
A recession might be coming. Here's what it could look like
Biden, G7 leaders announce joint declaration of support for Ukraine at NATO summit
The Fed has been raising interest rates. Why then are savings interest rates low?